Travel Weekly reported today that Sabre is exploring possible collaboration with G2 SwitchWorks. This is based on a comment made by Sabre CEO Sam Gilliland in response to a question from a Sabre employee on December 12th. Texas Pacific Group one of the private equity companies that purchased Sabre also holds a 20% stake in G2 Switchworks. What does all this mean? This could be a good test on whether the equity buyout truly impacts Sabre's strategic direction. Some pundits have voiced their view that the equity buyout will free up Sabre from the constraints of public ownership allowing the company to innovate. Another camp, looks at the acquisition as a short term cash cow for the new owners, who will likely seek to reduce costs at Sabre while positioning the company for a future sale. Remember that private equity's primary interest is bringing a good return back to its investors. If Sabre does pursue a relationship with G2, this would be a sign that the traditional "not invented here" philosophy is changing. G2 has been struggling to differentiate itself in light of the new GDS/airline agreements. How could the two really work together? If G2 continues to position their solution as an aggregation tool a layer above the GDS it would not be in Sabre's best interest to partner with a company who is essentially eliminating their traditional single source GDS model. On the other hand where the aggregation point lies is not as important as who owns middleware. G2 could benefit if Sabre where to endorse the G2 travel agent point of sale tool and help distribute it to the large Sabre subscriber base. This is an interesting story to watch as we enter the new era of private equity owned GDS.
Tuesday, December 12, 2006
The announcement today that two private equity firms are buying out Sabre is part of a bigger trend. Over the last two years, investors have been putting billions of dollars in private equity firms. Recently private equity has bought out firms with such well known brands as Clear Channel, Readers Digest, Eddie Bauer, Burger King, Hertz, Domino's Pizza and AMC Entertainment. What is behind this trend? There are two camps of thought. The first highlights the benefit of removing a company such as Sabre from public scrutiny where financial details are required to be shared as a publicly traded company. The other view of this trend is a bit more skeptical. One needs to remember that the private equity buyouts are intended to provide a profit for the equity investors. This is often realized when these buyout companies are in turn sold. The first step the equity owners take is to cut expenses at these companies. Often, private equity firms borrow money to buy a company and then keeps on borrowing. The private equity firms can borrow the money in the company's name and then can keep the money themselves. This saddles the company with the debt while the private equity firms continue to siphon money out of these companies. This is all fine and well as long as the company continues to bring in a substantial cash flow, but if things change the heavy debt could be a problem. So which scenario drove the Sabre deal? When private equity offers an acquisition price above the current stock price, companies such as Sabre have no choice but to accept the offer as the short term benefit to shareholders is clear. As with the Blackstone buyout of Travelport and the subsequent purchase of Worldspan the jury is still out on whether this will truly be good for the travel industry. My concern is that with the focus of private equity in cutting costs, the new owners of Sabre, Galileo and Worldspan may decide to eliminate needed R&D and slow the process of moving off legacy mainframe technology to more open systems.
Friday, December 08, 2006
Today's announcement by TRX on the acquisition of Hi-Mark marks a significant step in the area of corporate travel data management. Over the last 6-7 years Hi-Mark has successfully marketed their data management solution to many large corporate buyers. Despite this success, Hi-Mark's position in the market is strongest with second tier TMCs and corporate buyers. By acquiring Hi-Mark, TRX expands their reach to the mid to lower part of the market. TRX's DATATRAX is an extremely robust platform with a price tag only affordable to the high end of the market. With this acquisition TRX not only expands its reach, but eliminates a major competitor. It is clear that corporate travel data management is still a wide open market, particularly as procurement takes a more active role in travel management.
Thursday, December 07, 2006
After years of speculation, today's announcement of the merger between Travelport and Worldspan came as no great shock to anyone in the industry. The only surprising aspect of the deal is the lack of a competitive offer from Amadeus. As far as a fit, Amadeus and Worldspan would have been more complementary. Travelport has been suffering pre and post the Blackstone acquisition from an inability to easily integrate disparate entities and systems such as eBookers, Gulliver's and Galileo. The task of integrating Worldspan and Galileo is huge, and most likely will result in the Worldspan platform and brand fading from the marketplace. The biggest winner in this transaction is Rakesh Gangwal, whose golden parachute from the transaction is substantial. Considering his missteps at both USAir and Worldspan, his multi-million dollar payout seems unjust, but clearly reflects the benefit to Worldspan's stockholders not the industry at large. During his time at the helm at Worldspan, Gangwal saw the errors of his continued support of the "Worldspan inside" strategy with the loss of business from Expedia , Priceline and Orbitz. Worldspan's insistence to "stay the course" in regards to not launching their own online retail brand was a key factor in their demise. With executive compensation not reflecting actual performance, no wonder the traditional players in the industry are unable to anticipate the next wave of technology disruption.
Wednesday, November 29, 2006
Amadeus introduced a new technology service this week called Meta Pricer. The service "allows airlines to optimise marketing and distribution reach by making cost-efficient use of travel search engines". This is a clear effort to re-insert the GDS into the travel booking value chain in an era of increased fragmentation of content. There is no doubt that there is some benefit to suppliers on reducing hits on their Websites from site scrapping technology. In an era of disintermediation, this major distributor is trying to diversify beyond segment revenue and add value in a new way. Interesting move, let's see if airlines who have successfully dintermediated Amadeus by negotiating deals with meta search engines (SideStep, Kayak, Mobissimo) would be willing to add another layer in their distribution strategy in order to reduce automated hits on their sites. Kayak has implemented an alternate strategy using ITA software to calculate fares (with a cache of availability from a GDS) limiting the query to booking only. If more meta-search vendors adopt this strategy, the opportunity for Amadeus will be further diminished.
This week I met with Josh Steinitz, CEO of a new start-up called the Nile Project. The Nile Project uses personalization techniques enabling the consumer to create a more customized tour of a city. The consumer explicitly choosers an area of interest, then by using Ajax, the Nile project presents the consumer a limited number of preferences related to those interest. The application uses an Ajax slider (chose a value within a range) allowing the consumer to rate an attribute on a scale (e.g. cost from budget to most expensive). These than act as dynamic filters that present content that meets a consumer's requirements. Additionally the site acts as an aggregator of ratings from other sites (e.g Trip Advisor, Travelpost). As with other Travel 2.0 sites, trips can be shared with friend, relatives and travel companions. Once the itinerary is set, the Nile Project creates a customized itinerary in a PDF file so the consumer can take it along with them on the trip. The Nile Project represents a great example on how personalization can filter content to drive a more customized travel planning experience.
Thursday, November 16, 2006
It has been my pleasure to be associated with PhoCusWright over the last 7 years. I met Philip Wolf in the late 1980s and I have always repected Philip's ability to understand emerging trends and push the industry towards a more user centric approach to online and offline travel. I have been attending Philip's conference since its inception. Each year Philip and his team strive to provide an innovative approach to conference execution and this year was no exception. With a theme "Travel 2.0 Confronts the Establishment" the PhoCusWright team again pushed the envelope by breaking down the barrier between conference content and networking opportunities. Each attendee was able to listen to the on stage content through a wireless ear bud while still interacting with tradeshow participants. I applaud the PhoCusWright team for another successful innovative conference.
Wednesday, November 15, 2006
The VC panel this morning echoed a theme I have heard a lot over the last 8 months: VCs will only invest in online travel companies that have already established customers and revenue. The important thing to remember is that the true disruptors in the online travel market where not funded by VCs. Expedia was an incubator at Microsoft, Travelocity was launched with funding by Sabre and Orbitz was founded by the airlines. History teaches us that VCs are not very good at understanding the next online travel trend and with the current climate most will likely miss the next disruptive application
Tuesday, November 14, 2006
Wow, listening to Expedia, Travelocity, Orbitz and Priceline reinforces the fact that they are really the legacy online players. Nothing new from the panel and a characterization of Travel 2.0 as "tools" misses the fragmented nature of the every increasing number of new travel sites. Will Expedia et al be able to capture the Facebook/My Space generation?
I am listening to the opening panel at this year's PhoCusWright Executive Conference. The Wall Street panel seems to be missing the Travel 2.0 wave by labeling the new move to social networks and other Travel 2.0 brands as not worthy of investment and incapable of stand-alone success. The attitude expressed seems to be missing the next disruptive impact of true Travel 2.0 apps. I am not surprised that this panel is blind to the shift as they all cover the traditional 1.0 companies that has gone public, who in general also are not understanding the latest trend.This group probably ignored Google's growth in the early 2000's because the "search area" was already established. There is a tidal wave a foot and Wall Street is still focusing on traditional 1.0 companies, what a shame.
Monday, November 13, 2006
A little later today I will be off to the PhoCusWright Executive Conference in Hollywood. As an PhoCusWright analyst , I will be blogging both on the PCWI blog site and on this blog as well. With the focus on Travel 2.0, this year's conference promises to be packed with lots of announcements, engaging presentations and controversy -
o Are Travel 1.0 companies ready to embrace Travel 2.0?
o With the recent buzz about Web 3.0 ( the semantic Web), how will that impact this week's discussions?
o What new alliances will be announced at the conference?
I will keep you posted.
See you in Hollywood!
Wednesday, November 08, 2006
Much has been written about the changing travel distribution landscape. The four GDS have been forced to lower their fees in exchange for "full content" agreements with the airlines. A closer look at these agreements reveals loopholes regarding special promotional fares. Recently there has been some rumbling from the major hotel chains about going direct. TMC platforms such as TravelBahn (Amex) and Symphonie (CWT) are being promoted as the ultimate solution for total content. GNEs have emerged as viable aggregators and alternate distribution platforms.
Within this context, old models continue to be the dominant theme as the traditional distribution players promote their definition of total content. A key point missed by this familiar discussion concerns the very nature of the Internet itself. So let me ask, how many travel Websites are there on the Web? What percentage of these sites have content in a single system? This facetious comment does have a point. There is no limit on content on the Internet. One might argue that there are a limited number of airlines, hotels and car rental companies so therefore there is a limit on the number of potential content sources. That may be true, but once you add new Travel 2.0 sites that promote user generated content, predictive modeling or mash-ups of fares and maps, the true nature of content is revealed. I believe that no single system will ever have total travel content. Ultimately it is the consumer who acts as the ultimate aggregator. The continued discussion which paints content as finite, misses the very nature of the Internet. Travel 2.0 will be followed by Travel 3.0, 4.0 and beyond. The way we think about online travel may be radically different within 10 years. Let's abandon the archaic notion of total content access and recognize that the travel industry has been permanently changed by the Web. Expecting any one source whether GDS, OTA or GNE to have full content is not only outdated, but ignores the very nature of the Web. At the end of the day it is the consumer who decides the relevance of content sources.
Thursday, November 02, 2006
Second Life is a virtual world where you can explore and interact with other online players. Initially Second Life was similar to other online multi-player games where an avatar representing your real or desired self can teleport to anywhere in the virtual world. Second Life gained additional prominence when it was featured on the cover of the May 20th Business Week. In last 6 months Second Life has attracted more traditional corporate entities. Last month my former employer, Sun Microsystems held a press conference in Second Life. Howard Rheingold author of such visionary books such as Smart Mobs, recently gave a talk in Second Life.
The travel industry has also made their mark in this new virtual world. "Starwood, owner of the chic W brand as well as the Westin and Sheraton chains, became the first real-world hospitality company to open in Second Life, and joins a growing list of other companies who are using the online world to build their brand name, test products, or simply sell merchandise (albeit digital merchandise). You can't check into aloft, Starwood's new line of moderately priced, loft-style hotels, until the first quarter of 2008. Since September , you can wander into the lobby of its digital version inside the popular online world of Second Life."
How else could real world travel companies use this virtual world? By definition, your avatar is constantly traveling, though teleportation is much faster and does not cost any money verses an airline ticket in the real world. Who provides a guide for exploring Second Life? The search functionality can be used to pinpoint particular places of interest, but what if a large travel agency developed enough knowledge of the virtual world to create tours? This is only one example. Given the recent corporate focus on Second Life the travel industry needs to pay close attention this virtually world as a way to promote their brand and provide services at a fee.
Thursday, October 19, 2006
Traditionally, most software developers think of GPS or A-GPS as the preferred technology to pinpoint your location and deliver relevant content related to that location. Loki an application developed by Skyhook Wireless, uses the ubiquitousness of Wi-Fi networks to determine your location. Between the movement to provide wireless connectivity throughout a city (e.g. San Francisco, Philadelphia) and the integration of Wi-fi into portable devices (e.g. smartphones), the ability to use Wi-Fi to deliver location based services (LBS) has become a reality. In a recent article on LBS I authored for the PhoCusWright's GDX subscription service, I talked about the "walled garden" that exists at the wireless carriers which inhibits the advancement of broad distribution of applications. Despite the fact that the wireless carriers are gradually dismantling their "walled garden", companies such as Verizon and Cingular still make it difficult for travel software developers to use their network to deliver services that are specifically targeted to the business or leisure traveler.
Why is this important for the travel industry? The business and leisure traveler are by their very nature the best target for LBS. Business Travelers often are the early adopters of new technology. By enabling location identification through Wi-Fi access points, the traveler can benefit from a whole host of services. These may range from identifying restaurants in their immediate area to locating family members at a resort or theme park. These services can help suppliers and intermediaries bond with their customers while they are on their trip enhancing the travel experience and reinforcing the supplier or intermediary's brand.
Skyhook Wireless has recently opened up their API to allow software developers the ability to create location based applications on top of the Loki application. I encourage travel software companies to take a good look at Loki. Here is a link to a CNET video which describes the Loki service.
Friday, October 13, 2006
Every since I first viewed the historic Knowledge Navigator video produced by John Scully CEO of Apple in the late 1980's, I have believed that an intelligent assistant would truly be a killer app for the travel industry. As originally envisioned, Knowledge Navigator was going to be a tablet, the size of an opened magazine, and would have very sophisticated artificial intelligence. The machine would anticipate your needs and act on them. The Apple Newton was the first generation of these types of tools, but as anyone familiar with technology knows, the Newton was a resounding failure. (Though Palm a few years later did make PDAs a reality).
I have been involved with various AI scientists since the mid 1980s while I was still at United Airlines. A friend (the husband of one of my wife's bridesmaids) worked for a company called MAD Intelligent Systems here in
We are now in the future (certainly in 1980s terms) and AI applications have been used in a variety every day activities. Examples include control, planning and scheduling, the ability to answer diagnostic and consumer questions, handwriting, speech, and facial recognition.
Over the years I have worked with a variety of clients who have tried to use optimization technology, constraint engines and other pieces of AI software to improve the travel process. Disruptive technology such as the Orbitz fare matrix was built by the AI scientists at ITA Software. My partners at Fetch Technologies represent some of the brightest minds in AI today. Once we are funded I plan to use AI techniques to fulfill the dream first described in John Scully's video. The creation of a master itinerary will allow us to run background queries to search for better fares, rates, and travel research items based on consumer preferences. In the early 1990s TMCs touted their mid-office software (such as TRX's CoRRex) as a quality control tool and as a way to search for better fares and seats against the GDS inventory. We are now in a much more fragmented, Web-based environment and the ability to use AI "agents" to perform similar tasks against Web information is not only possible, but can truly change the travel shopping experience.
Thursday, October 05, 2006
I wanted to provide you an update on my efforts to launch a new company based on the extraction applications from Fetch Technologies. As a reminder, through the use of a Web browser plug-in, the application will allow the consumer to Collect, Organize and Share travel planning, research, shopping and purchases across all the major travel Websites. Travel Tech Consulting, Inc. and Fetch Technologies will be the founders of this new company (name TBD). Fetch will have a minority equity position in exchange for a perpetual license of their patent-pending "As U Browse" technology. The new company will own the source code and have field of use exclusivity (travel industry vertical). The new company will be based in the San Francisco Bay area.
I am currently in discussions with a number of VCs and Angel investors who are considering investing in the new start-up. I also have begun my search for potential employees who have experience in the online travel industry and are interested in participating in this new venture. If you know of someone who would be interested in either investing or joining our team, please email me at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Tuesday, September 19, 2006
The buzz about Web 2.0 and as a subset Travel 2.0, continues to get stronger. The flow of investment money into new start-ups in this area has been growing every month. As my readers know, I am always on the look out for emerging technology, not just for the "cool" factor, but with an eye on how it may change the underlying business practices in the travel industry. So apart from all the buzz words (social networking, mash-ups, user generated content) what does Travel 2.0 really mean to the underlying economics of the travel industry?
Any new wave of technology is often misunderstood upon its initial entry into the market, particularly on how it changes the economics of the business. That being said, a common cycle always occurs in respect to new waves of technology driven changes. The now hackney phrase of a "paradigm shift", still has an important underlying lesson that is still often overlooked: No dominant player in any market can simply rest on its laurels ignoring, or bad mouthing new technology driven by Travel 2.0 initiatives, while continuing to march at a snails pace in regards to innovation. For travel planning, the number of choices to shop fares, read travel blogs or search for packages has never been greater. The underlying message of Travel 2.0 should be setting off alarms at any Travel 1.0 company or application. This is true for the online travel market in both the consumer and corporate space. In fact, the corporate travel industry suffers from a long history of ignoring overall travel technology trends, suddenly to be awakened by their economic impact. In this sense the incumbent OTA giants (Expedia, Orbitz, Travelocity and Priceline) as well as the corporate online booking players (GetThere, Cliqbook, eTravel) must embrace new ways of thinking and if not risk being swept away by a new consumer driven trends. The economic impact of these changes is unknown, but the near term effect of an expanding universe of choices is clear: the old model where a single site or application can provide all information and comparative shopping capabilities for users is fading fast (if it every existed at all!). How can these single silo sites and applications embrace this new world? The first step is acknowledging the fact of the limitations of the single source concept, while seeking out partnerships that help bring the company's offering into more of a holistic solution.
Tuesday, September 05, 2006
The last minute agreement reached between AA and Sabre has many in the corporate travel world breathing a sigh of relief. I fear that TMCs and corporate customers will quickly return to a state of complacency regarding the radical underlying changes happening in travel distribution. Yes this agreement avoids the additional imposed fees, but by its nature the new agreement also reduces the amount of "financial assistance" available to TMCs and corporations (provided there was a pass through). Anyone who believes that this announcement means the end of the content issue between suppliers, distributors and customers, is being blind to the fact that a major restructuring is underway in travel distribution. As I have stated in previous blog entries, the issue is one of control over distribution. The desire of airlines to dynamically price their inventory in different channels still exists. The work of companies such as ITA Software and Datalex to change the underlying systems used by airlines is providing a new opportunity for channel management. I encourage all parties in the corporate (and leisure) value chain to be wary of any message like "mission accomplished". The story is not over yet.
Tuesday, August 22, 2006
My apologies for being off the radar for a few weeks. I've been called back by the U.S. government (GSA eTravel project) to assist with a major software procurement. I can't go into much detail, but the solution has the potential to save some significant dollars (as in Billions) for the U.S. taxpayer.
I wanted to comment on the position paper published by the Business Travel Coalition (BTC) in April and which has acted as the organization's talking points concerning corporate buyer's view of the current changes in travel distribution. For those not familiar with BTC, the organization has been around for approximately 10-15 years. BTC's leader Kevin Mitchell is a well known advocate of corporate buyers. The BTC membership consists of some of the largest U.S. corporations. Mr. Mitchell came to prominence in the 1990s when he took center stage at a NBTA convention calling on the major U.S. airlines to abandon their frequent flyer programs due to their counter productive effect on corporate policy compliance.
BTC's latest stance has some valid points. There is no question the current distribution changes may have a negative impact on corporate buyers through additional fees and lack of total content. Where I disagree with Mr. Mitchell is BTC's complete dismissal of the issue of U.S. airline health. Over the last 4 years the major U.S. airlines have racked up more losses than all other prior years combined. During that same period we've seen consistent profits from the GDS and large TMCs. It is in the best interest of U.S. corporations to recognize the need of these airlines to cut costs through distribution so that they can remain profitable . The key point missed by BTC's position paper is the need for corporate buyers to gain control of the distribution of their travel expenses. Whether this involves traditional methods such as switching (or threatening to switch) GDS at a particular location(s) or working with the so called GNEs who have the ability to direct sourcing at a segment level, the key message has to be purchasing leverage. Alfred Kahn's (the Father of airline deregulation) comment at the NBTA conference in the 1990s regarding the airlines still applies: the definition of "yield management" is "you yield to my management". Rather than complaining about the evolutionary changes happening in distribution, BTC should be focused on educating their participants and corporate buyers in general on strategies to regain leverage in airline negotiations by controlling distribution.
Wednesday, August 02, 2006
Microsoft's Live Labs has introduced a new technology that synthesizes photos of a single destination from a variety of sources to provide an immersive experience for the user. Photo tagging is already a big part of Travel 2.0 and this technology has the potential to provide a travel shopper a true virtual experience of a destination by integrating photos taken by different people into a 3-D view of the location. By allowing travelers to experience a destination as part of the travel planning process, travel sites can utilize user generated content in a new way. I encourage you to check out the short video at http://labs.live.com/photosynth/video.html
Thursday, July 20, 2006
For the last 8 months I've been working with BlackHistoryTours (BHT). The company was founded 6 years ago by Eric and Lisa Alboher. Since its creation, the primary focus has been on escorted bus tours for inner city youth to African American cultural sites. By creating tours around African American heritage sites (e.g. National Civil Rights Museum, the
The nationwide launch of BlackHistoryTours (BHT) will serve as a model for a family of companies that will include other ethnic segments (e.g. HispanicHeritage Tours, HolocaustHistoryTours) all focused on cultural heritage tourism. The company is currently seeking additional investment. If you know of any potential investors please contact me at email@example.com
Tuesday, July 18, 2006
I thought I'd chime in on the current industry focus regarding total access fees and the renegotiation of GDS contracts. I tend to look at this issue in a very black and white fashion:
- Financial incentives for travel agents (and TMCs) are going away. Whether this is the first step (e.g. Sabre, Galileo) or a complete elimination (Worldspan) of these payments, it is just a matter of time until these funds disappear
- No travel agent or TMC can depend on total content from a GDS no matter what happens with the remaining hold outs (e.g. AA and Sabre, DL and Worldspan)
- Larger TMCs have already implemented technology (e.g. CWT's Symphonie, Amex's TravelBahn) to aggregate content. Second tier TMCs and below need to lean on their consortium to find a solution to this aggregation problem
- The Air Canada Tango issue is only the tip of the iceberg of the coming changes in how airline inventory is distributed. With all due respect to BTC, I am not hopeful that a negotiated solution to this issue will be reached.
Yesterday HP announced a new "inexpensive, wireless, battery-free microchip that can store documents, audio files or video clips. The memory spots are similar in some ways to the more simplistic radio-frequency identification tags. But they are far smarter and more secure: They can store more than 250 times as much data as RFID, transmit data more than 20 times faster and encrypt it, sidestepping many of the privacy concerns over RFID tags." This new technology has significant implications for the travel industry. In the Mercury News article the reporter describes the new microchip as "an electronic Post-it note" that can store" dozen of pages of text, a 15-second video clip or other data" and that the results can be viewed on a screen of a cell phone that's waved in front of the chip, doing away with the need for a computer or Internet connection." This technology will be a crucial step towards what Howard Rheingold has described in his book Smart Mobs as "sentient things". The ability for anyone to annotate a physical location such as a restaurant, hotel or guided tours, places social networking into our every day lives. For example, I was on vacation the other week in Monterey California and my wife and I took a whale site seeing tour. Unfortunately during the 3 hour cruise we saw only two whales for about 4 seconds. If this tour company had memory spot at its offices I could have looked at reviews of this tour from other travelers and probably would have learned that whale sightings was rare that week. Now take that same line of thinking and expand it out to other travel spots such as hotels and restaurants and you can quickly see how HP's new memory spot technology will radically change our travel experience. The new technology is 2-5 years away from mass production, but has the potential to permanently change the way we interact with the physical world.
Thursday, June 29, 2006
The travel press have been playing up ITA Software's recent announcement with Air Canada as a sign that the GNEs have been unsuccessful in their quest to replace the GDS. Again I must reiterate a theme from my prior blog entries: this shift in distribution is not about us verses them (GNE verses GDS) but about the ever increasing likelihood that a single GDS will lack total travel content. Why is ITA focusing on airline automation? The answer is very simple. The majority of airlines still run their reservation platform as a partition of a GDS and thus some of the same inflexibility that exists in the GDS mainframe infrastructure also exists in the airline reservation systems. The underlying message here is that airlines want control over their distribution platform and there is no better way to seize control than to implement an entirely new airline reservation platform that is independent of the GDS. I've known for some time that this has been a main focus of ITA and thus the announcement was not surprising. Airlines want to control the level of fare inventory through different channels. It is this underlying desire which will likely increase the level of fragmentation in the market. Despite all the flurry of GDS announcements regarding their new airline contracts, no single GDS has signed all the major carriers. In addition, as details of the distribution deals surface it is likely that some of the travel agents may opt-out of the deal limiting their ability to gather complete content. The major TMCs (American Express, CWT, BCD) have already built (Amex TravelBahn, CWT Symphonie) or are in the process of building (BCD Project Renaissance) their own internal systems to aggregate content. At the end of the day the need for a GNE (with a focus on 2nd tier TMCs) will be more important as a tool to aggregate content across GDS as it will be for direct connection inventory. Both G2 Swtichworks and Farelogix recognize this and each has promoted this capability. By the end of this year, some of the smoke will clear giving us a clearer picture of who has what inventory and at what price. Who pays for this access is still unknown as TMCs will struggle on whether to pass on this cost their corporate customers. The bottom line is that fragmentation is here to stay. This will not only impact the corporate market, but the leisure market as well.
Friday, June 09, 2006
Last week I was again interviewed by Kyle Peterson of Reuters. The article entitled : "Internet Travel Agencies Losing Some Luster" talked about the drop in stock price of the leading OTAs (Expedia, Orbitz and Travelocity). My comments were primarily directed at the underlying technology and UI of these large players and the fact that there has been little innovation in the way consumers interact with OTAs in the last four years. With the emergence of Travel 2.0, the OTAs are starting to look like old school players. Their ability to embrace and integrate other sources of planning content is at the heart of my comments that OTAs "need to think of more creative ways for people to take advantage of all these new sources of information". Most OTAs seem content to simply continue to push a model of a single stop shop. Finding a way to benefit from new Travel 2.0 trends such as vertical search, mash-ups, user generated travel blogs, picture tagging and collaborative planning tools is an essential evolutionary step for the OTAs.
Monday, June 05, 2006
JetBlue pioneered Direct satellite TV services and now seems poised to offer Internet and new phone services on board with the successful winning bid on Air-Ground wireless license announced on Saturday. For some time I and others have been talking about U-Commerce (ubiquitous connectivity). The idea of the always connected consumer is quickly becoming the reality and it is nice to see JetBlue lead this innovation. Of course wireless Internet is nothing new as Boeing's Connexion has been deployed on long haul international routes for some time. Every segment of the travel industry needs to start planning today for the U-Commerce wave developing applications and strategies that assist the leisure and business traveler while they are in transit.
Friday, June 02, 2006
I am very lucky to have part of my family (my cousin) Marc A. Smith who is a research sociologist with Microsoft. Now rather than going off on the implications of Microsoft employing a sociologist, I instead wanted to share with you part of our conversation we had last week. Marc has been very accurate with predictions over the last 15 years. While he was getting his PhD. from UCLA he worked as a contractor with Microsoft developing a virtual world using avatars. The project was dropped by Microsoft, but we see evidence of this approach with environments such as Second Life. Also while completing his studies at UCLA, Marc created a product called Netscan, which analyzes the social trends of news groups. These are just a few things Marc has predicted, so when he provides me guidance, I listen carefully. During our conversation last week, Marc commented about how virtual tourism will play a major factor in travel planning for the future. Whether it's Google Earth, Windows Live Local, Amazon's A9 Maps or geo-coded pictures from Flicker, Marc believes that in the near term (3-5 years), Web surfers will be able to get a ground level view of a destination and take a virtual walking or driving tour. I am not saying that this immersive experience will replace travel, but by virtually experiencing a destination through ground level photos and videos, the planning of travel will permanently change.
Wednesday, May 24, 2006
On April 17th, 2006 the American Society of Travel Agents released a summary of a new Technology and Marketing Report which showed that the traditional travel professional spends an average of 17 hours per week on the Web searching on behalf of their clients. As part of my effort with the Fetch collaborative travel planning tool, I've done presentations and demos with many of the major travel consortium as well as leaders in the online travel world. Since the launch of the OTAs (Expedia, Travelocity, Orbitz) the mainstream media has helped foster the idea that traditional travel agents are a dying breed. As a analyst and consultant over the last 11 years, I have been involved with a number projects for more traditional travel companies, helping them develop holistic technology strategies. As a result I believe the role the offline agent plays in complex travel planning is still essential. I wanted to use this opportunity to start some dialogue within the industry on this subject. So what do you think? Are the pundits who envision a completely automated travel process correct, or is there still value in the professional travel agent? Obviously I have some strong opinions on this subject and I would have to admit part of my view is driven by what I believe is a an opportunity for the Fetch travel tool to bridge the gap between the consumer and agent Web search. May ask you comments on the subject?
Tuesday, May 23, 2006
I wanted to provide my readers an update on my efforts with Fetch Technologies and the "Travelsmart" (actual name TBD) tool. As I mentioned in an earlier blog entry, the Travelsmart tool allows consumers to collect, organize and share travel planning and booking content across all major travel Websites. Recently the last capability of sharing has been expanded to emphasize the collaborative travel planning and search capabilities of the product. The growth of user generated content is increasing the importance of a collaborative travel planning tool that combines the search efforts of the traveler, their spouse, friends and relatives (whether traveling with the traveler or providing advice based on past experiences with a destination) as well the role of the professional travel or call center support agent. Let's remember that Google does not work without a human driving the search. Travelsmart combines multiple parties efforts in planning and booking elements of a trip through a collaborative search process. We have a functional demo of the product that I've presented to over 30 travel industry executives. Overall the reaction has been very positive. Our short term strategy is to fund the completion of the development through distribution partners and angel funding. If your interested in seeing a Travelsmart demo please contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org
Tuesday, May 16, 2006
I would suggest my readers check out this article by Tim O'Reilly. Though it is a bit dated (09/30/2005) it does a great job of describing Web 2.0. Mr. O'Reilly's detailed analysis of the changes a foot in content and design is at he heart of new Web pages by Yahoo! (go to the new design page). Online travel has a long way to go to truly capture the Web 2.0 movement. The key themes need to be collaboration, user generated content and aggregation of multiple sources of data. Most of the major sites have not changed in any radical way to address this trend and thus have opened the door for new applications that harness these Web 2.0 capabilities.
Friday, May 12, 2006
As most of you know in addition to my own consulting practice I work as an analyst for PhoCusWright. I recently completed a GDX article on "Using Mobile Location-Based Services to Enhance the Travel Experience". The article discusses an evolving, more open mobile architecture which can enable travel companies to work more actively with the telecom carriers to deploy travel specific location based services. Here's the Abstract:
As wireless communication becomes ubiquitous, a new opportunity is emerging to deliver highly personalized services to mobile users. One of the most powerful ways to personalize mobile services is to provide applications that are based on location. Since the late 1990s, the travel industry has experimented with mobile applications with minimal success. Recent changes in the underlying infrastructure for mobile application delivery is enabling a new way to deploy location-based services(LBS), providing travel companies the ability to deploy mobile applications that can be targeted at the leisure and business traveler. By the very nature of travel, early adopters of mobile applications such as LBS are often frequent travelers. Despite this fact, LBS applications that specifically target travelers have been slow to emerge in the market. With rapid adoption of smart phone technology and the increasing availability of higher speed wireless networks, the ability for travel suppliers and intermediaries to communicate with their frequent customers while on the road has never been greater. The mobile phone has emerged as the primary device for traveler communication. This Spotlight examines how LBS are created and provides insight into how they will and should impact travel e-commerce.
Friday, May 05, 2006
Early this week Air Canada announced that no-frills Tango fares would be available exclusively through AirCanada.com, not through any of the GDS. This announcement is very significant in terms of the evolving world of travel distribution as well as the ongoing debate of GDS vs GNE. From a supplier's perspective distribution must provide low cost (something very clear to everyone in the industry) but also added value. In prior blog entries I discussed the need for airlines to implement channel management strategies which provide different pricing to different channels. I also have voiced my opinion over the last 2 years, the GDS vs GNE debate is not only about price, but also about the underlying technology. Air Canada is offering discounts of $8 one way or $16 roundtrip on Tango fares if travelers "opt out" of checking bags or changing their itineraries. The bottom line is that the GDS cannot handles this type of creative pricing based on customer preferences. Thus we've now witnessed a concrete example of how the legacy GDS environment is incapable of flexible pricing that matches creative channel distribution. I anticipate a lot more innovative pricing to emerge over the next two years exposing some of the inflexibility of the primarily mainframe-based GDS and demonstrating the true value of the GNEs. I am hopeful that the GDS will continue to offload functions from their mainframe to lower costs and provide a more flexible server technology, but until the core passenger name record (PNR) is de-coupled from the transaction system, true customer specific pricing will not be possible.
Monday, May 01, 2006
In recent PhoCusWright FYI pieces written by Cathy Schetzina, Direction of Information Services and Bob Offutt, Technology Analyst as well as an earlier piece written by John Bray, Vice President of Advisory Services, the authors describe a second generation Web 2.0 environment based on user generated content. I am in complete agreement with my colleagues at PhoCusWright on this issue and wanted point out a specific example on how user generated content can be tied to geo coding. Cathy and Bob mention Flickr tags in their article, but did not specifically highlight the Geo Coding aspect of these tags. If you go to http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags you can get a list of all time most popular tags. Immediately one will note the fact that top cities such as Amsterdam, Chicago and London show up on this list. Integrating this digital content, reviews from both online review sites such as Trip Advisor and IgoUgo as well as blogs, and other user generated rants and raves, highlights the need to find a way to filter this content and validate the input. Reputation systems that rate content based on the reputation created by the author is one way to sort through the ever increasing user input. Another idea is using constraint engine technology allowing the user to filter not only end user content, but all content based on a set of constraints defined by the user is another technology to consider. More on this technology in future blog entries.
Southwest Airlines has launched a blog as part of their Web strategy. This is an interesting example of how companies are trying to use newer forms of community generated content to help position their product. Southwest which has always tried to differentiate itself by its "happy" employees, is using the Blog to allow pilots, flight attendants, airport employees and management to express a point of view. Will other travel suppliers also create their own blogs? The biggest fear of any supplier is that the vocal minority of angry customers will take over the blog and thus cause some bad PR. This concern is justified, but overlooks the fact that the Web has already enabled dissatisfied customers to voice their opinions (e.g. Trip Advisor, IgoUgo). As consumer generated content becomes more ingrained into the buying process, providing an outlet for consumers through a supplier generated blog begins to make more sense, if it truly empowers consumers to have a direct dialog with management. If the blob ends up being simply a PR mechanism, it will have limited impact on shaping the consumer opinion and could ultimately anger consumers who want to express their views.
Thursday, April 27, 2006
Today another chapter was written in the restructuring of the travel industry with the dual announcements from CWT concerning the acquisition of TQ3 Navigant and the buyout of the Accor share of CWT by One Equity Partners. Was this really unexpected? Accor clearly signaled that they wanted to sell their half of CWT last month. Most pundits believed it would be very difficult for Navigant to re-create the TQ3 international presence. So clearly this should not be a surprise to anyone. The press has for years characterized CWT as a #2 to Amex's #1 position. To maintain this, (and perhaps go after Amex) CWT needed to continue to grow and acquisition was the most logical path. The next shoe to drop will concern Cendant and who ends up with Travelport. The interesting part of many of the deals of recent years is the role private equity has played with major acquisitions (e.g Worldspan, Amadeus, CWT and most likely Cendant). Private equity is looking for immediate returns and all four of these companies are profitable with solid ongoing income. Private equity is also funding the GNEs (e.g. ITA Software, G2, Farelogix). So who's right, the funding on traditional players or the embracing of new distribution platforms? Time will be the final judge. I would venture to speculate that ten years from now there will five players in the distribution game (3 GDS and 2 GNEs) and they will look very much alike. On the TMC front today's announcements means more pressure on 2nd tier TMCs and their associated consortium (e.g. Radius) or partnerships (GET) forcing them to prove that their model works and is able to compete against the new mega - mega TMCs.
Monday, April 24, 2006
Friday, April 21, 2006
A recent study by the Institute for Travel Management, a UK based organization that focuses on corporate travel, highlighted the disconnect between pundit predictions on the adoption of self-booking tools (SBTs) and feedback from members on a recent poll. The conclusions drawn from this survey emphasized the gap between the expectations of buyers and the actual adoption as well as the disconnect with their TMCs. Based on recent research I conducted that will shortly be published by PhoCusWright, I understand the reason for this response, but differ in my opinion on why buyers voiced these concerns. Overall Europe is at a different evolutionary stage of SBT deployment. The UK and Nordic regions are the most advanced in SBT selection and deployment, but overall the market is still below 20% adoption for corporate self-booking tools. The US experienced similar disappointment and lack of TMC integration when SBT became the major trend in 2000. A good portion of the problem with TMC relationships lies in the second tier TMCs who don't fully support self-booking viewing it as competitor to their standard services. The European market is now moving quickly to come up to speed with online corporate technology and thus it is my opinion that these issues will begin to fade as more companies embrace online channels and more 2nd TMCs come to the conclusion that Self-booking is a critical part of the travel management process.
Monday, April 17, 2006
Some media outlets picked up as news speculation in Russell Shaw's Znet blog that Google intends to enter the travel booking market and partner with Orbitz. This story demonstrates a number of interesting trends. First how a blog can generate a "news story". The basis for Mr. Shaw's speculation concerns a job posting for a "Senior Account Executive Travel Vertical". I am amazed that Mr. Shaw would draw broad conclusions from this job posting considering the fact that Google has had similar postings on the Web for the last two years. This job posting is nothing more than an advertisement for a sales representative to target potential travel advertisers based in Chicago. To take this job listing and speculate that Google will now enter the travel reservation business with Orbitz is not only a wild jump in logic, but demonstrates how educated tech writers are not necessarily educated in the nuances of the travel industry. Don't get me wrong, I do suspect that Google is considering some sort of travel vertical initiative, but to use this job posting as evidence shows that the writer lacks an understanding of Google's current travel industry positioning. I would more accurately speculate that when Google does make its move into the travel industry it will leverage its core search capabilities to drill deep into travel Web sites, allowing more effective comparative shopping. A more logical observation from Mr. Shaw should have concerned the Google capability to search multiple travel sites when you enter a city pair (e.g. San Francisco New York) into the search engine. This feature was introduced in 2005, something Mr. Shaw doesn't even mention in his blog.
Friday, April 07, 2006
During the last two weeks Worldspan has announced new five year contracts with three large airlines: American, Continental and Lufthansa. Do these contracts signal the end of the buzz around alternate distribution? In my view, major structural change in distribution will continue (and even accelerate) despite these announcements. Many pundits are quick to point out that it was these three airlines that seemed to be making the most noise about alternate distribution and that their agreements with Worldspan seems to contradict their very public efforts. AA and CO were in the news with letters to travel agents saying that they may not participate in all GDS. As part of the Star Alliance, Lufthansa's technology subsidiary (Lufthansa Systems) announced a new agreement with Farelogix to power an alternate distribution platform for Europe. The bottom line change that is happening in distribution is NOT only about GDS bypass, but overall distribution preferencing. In other words, there are major changes under foot to allow suppliers and distributors to direct where inventory is shopped, priced and fulfilled. This capability goes down to the individual reservation level and can be different at each stage of the booking process. This underlying ability to control distribution is at the heart of the changes happening behind the scenes between suppliers and intermediaries. It is essential that everyone stay tuned to this issue as I believe it will permanently impact both consumer and business travel reservation processing.
Thursday, April 06, 2006
On Monday evening I returned from a week in
Tuesday, March 07, 2006
A clear battleground is emerging around the airline's efforts to capture high yield traffic through low cost distribution. First I need to clearly define what I and the industry mean by the term "high yield traffic". In a simple sense, high yield refers to the travel segment that is willing to pay a higher fare for a perceived value. This may sound counter intuitive as leisure customers browse or use meta-search for comparison shopping and corporate customers push for lower fares based on volume discounts. A focus on high yield customers is not a new thing, as I recall listening to many GDS executives at different travel conferences over the last 4-5 years who preached the benefits of using GDS distribution as a way to access high yield customers (no doubt a heated discussion this year as GDS try to re-sign the major carriers to full access agreements). At the heart of this high yield focus is the belief by travel suppliers that they can offer a differentiated product to attract customers. Historically business travelers would often choose more expensive flights based on short travel windows, schedule advantages (non stop verses connections), ability to upgrade, airport preferences or other factors. Obviously the emergence and high adoption of Self Booking Tools (SBTs) has allowed larger corporations to control and track this behavior at the point of sale. So who is the high yield customer? An obvious answer to this question focuses on the large mid-market (corporations that spend between $2M - $12M on air annually) which has been slow to adopt online booking (26% according to the latest BTN report) and where many 2nd tier and 3rd tier TMCs continue to hold on to customers. The recent resurgence of airline corporate portals are an additional attempt by the carriers to attract the mid-market to their direct channel. Rather than limiting this focus on just the mid-market, I would argue that every single customer including leisure shoppers, small and mid market business travelers and large corporate travelers are potentially high yield customers, provided the airline can truly differentiate their products by demonstrating the value associated with a higher cost. This value may be in terms of a superior schedule, the ability to sell seats at different prices (aisle or window seats vs middle seats) , inflight amenities such as satellite TV and inflight wireless internet or the ability to upgrade to a more comfortable seat. In one sense, in an effort to differentiate, the airlines may in the midst of their own version of what we've seen in the hospitality market regarding the recent "bedding wars" among the major chains. Will the airlines succeed in differentiating their products and capture higher yield customers? The jury is still out and I would love to here your thoughts on the subject.
Tuesday, February 21, 2006
For years a standard travel e-commerce approach to online booking involved licensing a "booking engine" for the Website. These booking engines began as a front-end to the GDS allowing the consumer to book air, car and hotel online. As travel e-commerce became more complex, booking engines often added business logic and customer profile information. An alternative trend to enable Website booking capabilities has an emphasis on the a robust middleware application. With this approach, the booking engine is nothing more than a presentation layer that sits on top of the middleware software and relies on it for all of its communication and business logic. The same middleware layer powers call center applications providing a common platform for online and offline customer interaction. A robust booking engine which contains customer profile information and business logic limits the use of the these functions for offline call center agents. Despite the hype around touchless travel, the offline customer agent still plays a critical role in travel e-commerce, especially for complex itineraries. Allowing this agent to pick up and complete partial reservations created by the consumer is an important role and turns call centers into customer care centers. This trend towards a robust middleware application continues to grow with many vendors providing this new functionality.
Thursday, February 09, 2006
When I launched my consulting practice in 1995, many of my early clients (Carlson Leisure Group, Broadvision) focused on using personalization techniques for travel planning and booking. It is surprising that now in 2006, we've still seen few efforts by the major travel players to filter queries and deliver more personalized information for their customers. There are some obvious concerns about embarking down a personalization track. Consumers have little patience to fill out detailed preference profile forms (as well as privacy concerns) and attempts to determine preferences implicitly often alarms consumers that "big brother" is watching. Despite these obstacles, I am still convinced that personalization has a role in travel planning. Currently a basic knowledge of past itineraries is not being used to predict future choices. If you are working on personalization techniques for leisure or corporate booking systems, please let me know as still believe that providing filtered content that meets customer's needs can improve the efficiency of online booking and value to the end consumer.
Thursday, February 02, 2006
I wanted to further clarify my beliefs regarding the changing travel distribution environment. First let me make one point clear, I do not believe the GDS will "replaced" by the so called GNEs. A more realistic scenario is that both GDS and GNEs will exist as low cost distribution channels. The debate should not be framed around GDS verses GNEs. Instead the issue concerns the point at which travel content is aggregated. Whether the major industry players are willing to admit it or not, we live in an environment where inventory is already fragmented. Here are just a few examples to prove my point:
1) LCCs such as Southwest airlines cannot be purchased online other than at southwest.com
2) In Europe where 80% of the hotel inventory is from independent properties a majority of these properties are not in the GDS and therefore not available through traditional GDS-based booking engines. This applies to rail and ferry travel as well.
3) The major TMCs such as WorldTravel are investing millions in a new platform (project Renaissance) that will aggregate content from multiple inventory sources.
4) Large leisure agencies (e.g. Liberty Travel) have also been investing heavily in infrastructure changes to accommodate the new multi-source environment.
At the end of the day, suppliers (air, car and hotel) must have the right to chose how they want to distribute their product and at what price. This is basic market economics which has been masked by a distribution environment controlled by a few large entities (the oligopoly that has been the GDS). The Internet has permanently changed distribution by opening new and emerging channels. The GDS will continue to be a major source for travel inventory, just not the ONLY source.
Wednesday, February 01, 2006
It was nice to be quoted in a today's Reuters' article. Unfortunately , the reporter became confused between the definition and concept of a GDS and that of an online travel agent. Though there is a connection between online travel and the GDS, (Travelocity and Orbitz are owned by two of the GDS, in the case of Cendant they own both Galileo and Orbitz) the way the reporter tied the two together is incorrect and misleading. The issue is about distribution and value, not online travel. Considering Orbitz's direct link technology, they themselves are already bypassing the GDS. My comment about leakage stands. I believe we will see some inventory go through GNEs in 2006. The real question to ask the GDS, is how low can you go? Is there a floor on their ability to match GNE pricing? What role does technology play in setting distribution costs? The GNEs say it plays a major role. The GDS says its all about price. We'll see who's right this year...
Tuesday, January 31, 2006
Dynamic packaging has continued to be the topic du jour for many suppliers and intermediaries. In addition to online travel agencies offering dynamic packaging, many core supplier have also thrown in their hat to the dynamic packaging trend. A driving reason for suppliers to offer dynamic packaging is the underlying belief that dynamic packaging will lead to increased stickiness and greater value to the brand loyal consumer. In my study entitled "Selling Complex Leisure Travel Online: Focus on Dynamic Packaging Technology" I described the emerging platform for dynamic packaging along with some of the factors driving this trend. Despite a clear growth of packaging options, many consumers continue to shop across sites combining air, hotel, car, destination research, and activities into their own custom itinerary. Will we ever see a day where these two trends converge to allow consumers to shop across sites, but still obtain an overall package price? It is unlikely that this will happen anytime soon, but this capability should not be overlooked as the Internet travel space continues to evolve. The Web is about freedom and consumers will continue to do comparison shopping no matter the capabilities of an individual site.
Thursday, January 26, 2006
I wanted to let my blog readers know of a new start up I am launching in conjunction with Fetch Technologies. Without divulging too much information, the new entity is based on patented AI search technology from Fetch that indexes the "deep Web". The product will be a traveler tool that allows the consumer to "Collect, Organize and Share" information from ANY travel Web site. More news about this exciting new start-up as it develops. In the meantime go to the Fetch Website and check out the Fetch Technologies Featured on KCAL 9 News link to learn more about the company.
Tuesday, January 17, 2006
My friends at PhoCusWright have released a new study in conjunction with NYU entitled: "The Effects of Emerging Technologies on the Travel, Tourism and Hospitality Marketplace". The research was created to measure the impact of new technologies on travel, tourism and hospitality companies, analyze their influence on current distribution channels and explore future technologies that will affect the way travel is purchased in the next five years. From that study the following list of Technologies with the MOST Impact on Travel Over the Next Five Years were published:
1) Data mining
2) Metasearch technology
4) Data warehousing (tie)
4) SEO (Search Engine Optimization) (tie)
5) Dashboard marketing mix models
6) Wireless connectivity
7) e-Procurement systems
8) Automatic check-in/out (tie)
8) Deep Web searching (tie)
8) Business management applications (tie)
10) RSS (Real Simple Syndication)
I am curious whether my Blog readers agree with this list. Is there anything missing? How would you change the order? Is this too US-centric?
Please post your comments.
Thursday, January 12, 2006
The game of musical chairs in the global TMC market continues with the announcement this week of the purchase of Synergi by The Travel Company who themselves where recently purchased by BCD (owner of WorldTravel). I view this as a stop gap measure designed to give BCD an immediate global presence. BCD will likely go ahead and purchase some of the members of this network, but for the time being the global reach of Synergi provides the new BCD TMC representation in 45 countries. The thing to keep in mind in that the "music hasn't stopped" in this game of musical chairs. Expect a lot more announcements from BCD, Hogg Robinson and TQ3 Navigant International over the next few weeks. These changes combined with contract renewals this year for GDS / airline DCA type agreements promises to make 2006 a turbulent year for business travel (sorry for the pun).
Wednesday, January 04, 2006
In late 2003 I wrote a research report entitled Emerging Trends in Wireless Technology and The Global Travel Industry. In this study I reviewed current trends in wireless technology, specific wireless travel applications and ideas for future wireless apps. Much to my dismay, many of my predications have not yet materialized (certainly not in the US). The failure of my predictions are a function of timing rather than accuracy. With 3G (third generation) networks now standard in Europe and rapidly emerging in the US, and cities such as San Francisco and Philadelphia building Wi-Fi networks, 2006 may finally signal the explosion of travel oriented wireless applications. There are three key points I addressed in the study that still apply, travel apps must be: 1) Location based - the app should reflect the specific location of the user 2) Situational based- the app must apply to the particular need of the user (e.g. searching for restaurant's in NYC) and 3) Opt-in- any message received promoting a service or product must be on an opt-in basis (permission based marketing). If you have or are developing any travel oriented wireless applications, I'd love to learn about it. Please contact me at email@example.com
Tuesday, January 03, 2006
Today's announcement may have caught many by surprise. In case you haven't seen it -
1) WorldTravel and BTI are dissolving their partnership
2) BTI UK will most likely be re-branded as Hogg Robinson and will likely purchase additional agencies in the US
3) TQ3 (TUI) is selling its European operations to BCD (the owner of WorldTravel)
4) Navigant will retain the TQ3 brand but now has limited operations outside the US
As part of study I am authoring for PhoCusWright (to be released in Q1 2006 and distributed by ACTE), I became very much aware that something was up with these three entities during my research late last year. The conflict was clear between BTI and WorldTravel as each had separate initiatives to provide GDS independence and aggregation services for its clients. In late 2005, TQ3 also announced an aggregation platform initiative, obviously now part of the WorldTravel project Renaissance.
What does this all mean? - Complete ownership is crucial to complete on the global TMC stage. When the dust clears there still will be four mega-TMCs - Amex, CWT, Hogg Robinson and WorldTravel. Navigant International either through the TQ3 brand or some other means now needs to build a global network to compete. Given the number of large global wins over the last 12 months by the BTI organization, it is unclear how the two former partners will be able to continue to work together given their emerging competitive stance, though both PR organizations are hard at work trying to reassure global clients. This change may trigger some of the large BTI clients to re-bid their TMC services. Overall this announcement is good news in the short term for Amex and CWT who have their global organizations in place. In the long run these new entities will represent stronger global players. Ownership in major markets around the world has become a requirement to compete for global accounts. This is challenging news for agencies that belong to Radius and Synergi.